Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works

Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works

Listen to the Podcast.

“Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works” is written by A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin, two highly experienced professionals who played pivotal roles in transforming Procter & Gamble (P&G). The book introduces a strategic framework that helped P&G regain its competitive edge and double its value over the course of a decade. It is designed as a practical guide to help businesses, regardless of their size or industry, make strategic decisions to win in the marketplace.

The authors define strategy as an integrated set of choices that position a business to create a sustainable competitive advantage. Their framework revolves around answering five key questions: What is your winning aspiration? Where will you play? How will you win? What capabilities must be in place? What management systems are required?

This book is especially relevant to leaders, entrepreneurs, and self-improvement enthusiasts because it simplifies the often complex topic of strategy. It demystifies the process of strategic decision-making and emphasizes practical application, making it accessible to businesses ranging from startups to global enterprises. For entrepreneurs, especially those leading smaller ventures, this strategic approach can guide long-term decisions on where to invest resources, how to compete effectively, and how to build the necessary capabilities to succeed.

Example of Business Application: A compelling case in the book is Procter & Gamble’s rejuvenation of the Olay brand. By shifting focus from older demographics to younger women (35+), and repositioning the brand from a low-cost option to a premium “masstige” brand, Olay saw a dramatic rise in both sales and profitability. The strategy involved a clear understanding of customer needs, product innovation, repositioning, and a strong go-to-market plan. This strategic repositioning aligns with Lafley and Martin’s five questions and exemplifies how making the right strategic choices can lead to sustainable success.

Summary of Key Concepts

1. Winning Aspiration: Every organization must aim to win, not merely survive. A winning aspiration outlines the higher goal or purpose. It directs the company’s long-term focus. For example, P&G’s aspiration is to improve consumers’ lives through superior products.

2. Where to Play: This decision narrows down the competitive field. Where a company chooses to play involves selecting the markets, geographies, customer segments, and channels where it can leverage its strengths. P&G’s choice to create a “masstige” segment for Olay—products that bridge the gap between mass-market and luxury—is a good example.

3. How to Win: The “how” focuses on the specific tactics that will lead to success in the chosen playing field. P&G decided to win by investing heavily in research, product innovation, and by creating a compelling marketing campaign around anti-aging solutions.

4. Core Capabilities: A company’s core capabilities are the set of competencies necessary to execute the strategy. For P&G, deep consumer understanding and R&D innovation were crucial for Olay’s success. Companies must assess their strengths and focus on building the ones that matter most for their strategy.

5. Management Systems: To sustain a strategy, effective management systems are required. These systems measure progress, foster the needed capabilities, and ensure alignment between strategic objectives and day-to-day operations. P&G’s innovation systems and global scale helped execute their Olay strategy across multiple markets.

1. Strategy Is Choice

In Chapter 1 of Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works, titled “Strategy Is Choice,” authors A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin lay the foundation of their strategic framework by redefining the essence of strategy. They emphasize that at its core, strategy is about making choices. Successful strategy, they argue, is not an abstract vision or a rigid plan; rather, it is a coordinated and integrated set of choices that positions a company to win in the marketplace.

This chapter explains that while many companies attempt to create strategies, they often fall into common traps, such as defining strategy as mere optimization of the status quo, focusing on vision statements without concrete steps, or being reactive rather than proactive. The authors clarify that real strategy requires making hard, deliberate choices about where to compete and how to succeed.

The Importance of Making Choices

The key premise of the chapter is that strategy is choice. Businesses must make choices about what they will do—and what they will not do—to create a sustainable competitive advantage. These choices involve determining:

1. What winning looks like for the organization.
2. Where to play, which includes choosing the right markets, customer segments, and product categories.
3. How to win within those chosen segments through unique value propositions and differentiation.
4. What capabilities are necessary to support those choices and execute them successfully.
5. What management systems will support, measure, and sustain these efforts.

By making clear, specific choices, businesses can align their actions and resources around a focused strategy, rather than trying to pursue vague goals or react to external pressures.

The Misconceptions About Strategy

Many companies fall into the trap of ineffective strategy by misunderstanding what strategy really is. Lafley and Martin highlight several common misconceptions:

1. Strategy as Vision: While vision and mission statements are important, they do not constitute a strategy. Vision provides a sense of purpose, but it is not a roadmap for achieving goals.
2. Strategy as a Plan: Detailed plans outlining actions are not enough to win. Plans must be linked to clear choices that lead to competitive advantage.
3. Reactive Strategy: Some businesses believe that long-term strategy is impossible in a rapidly changing world. While adaptability is important, strategic thinking allows companies to make proactive decisions, even in volatile environments.
4. Optimization of the Status Quo: Improving existing processes and squeezing more value from current operations can be useful but does not replace the need for bold strategic choices. Companies must continuously assess whether they are investing in the right areas.
5. Best Practices as Strategy: Benchmarking against competitors and following industry trends can help improve operations, but this is not a strategy. True strategy involves doing something different that gives a business an edge over its competitors.

The authors argue that companies must embrace the discomfort of making tough choices. By closing some doors and focusing on a few high-impact actions, companies can direct their resources more effectively toward winning in the marketplace.

The Strategic Choice Cascade

The chapter introduces the concept of the Strategic Choice Cascade, a framework that organizes the five key choices every company must make:

1. What is your winning aspiration?
2. Where will you play?
3. How will you win?
4. What capabilities must be in place?
5. What management systems are required?

This cascade is the backbone of the strategic framework, as each choice builds on the one before it, creating a cohesive plan that addresses every aspect of winning in the marketplace. The authors stress that these choices are not made in isolation but must be interlinked and aligned. The choice of where to play must inform how to win, and the capabilities and management systems must support those choices.

Real-World Application: Olay’s Strategic Repositioning

To illustrate the power of strategic choice, Lafley and Martin recount the transformation of Olay, a once-aging skincare brand under P&G’s umbrella. By the late 1990s, Olay was struggling with declining relevance, earning the nickname “Oil of Old Lady.” The brand was associated with older customers and had a stagnant product line that wasn’t resonating with younger women.

Faced with the decision of whether to let the brand fade or to reinvent it, P&G made the strategic choice to target women in their mid-thirties who were just beginning to notice signs of aging. This repositioning shifted Olay from a discount product to a premium “masstige” brand that bridged the gap between mass-market and prestige skincare products.

This decision also involved making critical choices about where to play (focusing on mass retail channels like drugstores) and how to win (offering innovative anti-aging products at competitive prices, backed by scientific credibility). The transformation required significant investments in product innovation, branding, packaging, and consumer insights. By making these focused choices, Olay became a leading global skincare brand with annual sales exceeding $2 billion.

Strategy as an Ongoing Discipline

Chapter 1 sets the stage for the rest of Playing to Win by making it clear that strategy is a discipline of making choices. The success of a company depends on its ability to define what winning means, select the right opportunities, and back those choices with the right capabilities and systems. While many companies struggle with strategy because they are unwilling to make difficult decisions, those that embrace the necessity of choice can create a powerful and sustainable competitive advantage.

The chapter emphasizes that strategy should not be viewed as a one-time exercise but as an ongoing process. Companies must constantly revisit their choices to ensure they remain aligned with their goals and responsive to changes in the competitive environment. By following the strategic choice cascade, leaders can create clear, actionable strategies that lead to long-term success.

2. What Is Winning

Chapter 2 of Playing to Win by A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin, titled “What Is Winning,” shifts the focus to the ultimate objective of strategy: winning. The authors argue that the fundamental purpose of any strategy is to win, not just to survive or do well enough. Winning means achieving a position of sustainable competitive advantage, delivering superior value to customers, and ensuring superior returns for the business.

In this chapter, Lafley and Martin address the question “What does winning look like for your organization?” They make it clear that winning is not just about setting lofty aspirations or broad visions, but about crafting a strategic direction that leads to real, measurable outcomes in the marketplace. To win, organizations must define success in tangible terms and then align all strategic choices to support that goal.

Defining a Winning Aspiration

The first step in any successful strategy is to define a winning aspiration—a clear articulation of what success looks like. A winning aspiration goes beyond profit or growth; it reflects the organization’s broader purpose, the value it seeks to create for its customers, and the way it will change or influence its industry.

Lafley and Martin explain that winning aspirations should focus on people rather than money. Many companies mistakenly define winning in purely financial terms, such as revenue targets or stock price. While financial outcomes are important, they are the result of delivering superior value to customers. A truly powerful aspiration focuses on improving the lives of customers, solving meaningful problems, or providing a superior experience, which in turn drives financial success.

For example, during Lafley’s tenure as CEO of Procter & Gamble (P&G), the company’s winning aspiration was “to improve the lives of the world’s consumers” by delivering superior quality and value. This aspiration went beyond profit and market share, focusing instead on the customer experience, which then became the foundation for all of P&G’s strategic decisions.

Winning Requires Focus

A critical insight from Chapter 2 is that companies cannot win by doing everything. To truly succeed, businesses must focus on a specific market, a particular customer segment, or a unique value proposition. Without this focus, businesses risk spreading their resources too thin and diluting their competitive advantage.

The authors emphasize that strategy is about making deliberate choices. Not only must companies decide where they want to play, but they must also choose where they will not play. This focus enables organizations to channel their resources and capabilities effectively toward winning in a specific domain, rather than trying to compete on too many fronts.

A lack of focus often leads companies to adopt vague aspirations that are hard to act on. Many organizations have mission statements that express good intentions but lack specificity. For example, “to be the best” or “to deliver excellence” are aspirations that sound admirable but provide no clear guidance for action. In contrast, a focused aspiration like “to become the market leader in environmentally friendly cleaning products in North America by 2025” gives the organization a clear, actionable target to work toward.

Real-World Application: Starbucks’ Winning Aspiration

Lafley and Martin use Starbucks as a case study to illustrate how a winning aspiration can shape strategy. Starbucks’ mission is “to inspire and nurture the human spirit—one person, one cup, and one neighborhood at a time.” This mission provides clarity on what winning looks like for Starbucks: creating a personal connection with each customer, building community, and delivering a consistently excellent coffee experience.

This aspiration guided Starbucks’ expansion strategy, influencing decisions on store locations, design, and customer service. By focusing on delivering a unique and personal coffee experience, Starbucks distinguished itself from competitors like Dunkin’ and McDonald’s, which focused more on price and convenience. Starbucks’ winning aspiration allowed it to define its niche, win in the specialty coffee segment, and expand globally.

What Is Not Winning?

While defining what winning looks like is essential, Lafley and Martin also explore what winning is not. They warn against several common pitfalls that can derail an organization’s strategy:

1. Surviving is not winning: Some companies set their goals around surviving economic downturns or avoiding failure. While survival may be a short-term necessity, it should not be the ultimate aspiration. Winning is about thriving, growing, and outperforming competitors.
2. Copying others is not winning: Many organizations try to emulate the strategies of successful competitors. However, simply following best practices or copying a rival’s approach does not create differentiation. To win, companies must develop their own unique strategy that leverages their distinctive strengths.
3. Merely competing is not winning: Too many companies are satisfied with being “in the game” or having a share of the market. True winning involves dominating your chosen market and achieving a clear advantage over competitors.

The authors emphasize that if a company’s aspiration is to simply play rather than win, it will not achieve its full potential. Winning requires a mindset that is focused on achieving superiority in the marketplace and delivering exceptional value to customers.

Winning Across Different Levels of the Organization

An important point raised in Chapter 2 is that winning aspirations should exist at every level of the organization. The concept of winning is not just for the corporate headquarters or top executives. Business units, functions, and even individual teams need their own winning aspirations that align with the company’s overall strategy.

For example, a customer service department might define winning as “providing industry-leading customer satisfaction scores and resolving 95% of all issues on the first call.” This aspiration aligns with the broader company goal of delivering superior value and improving customer experience.

By defining winning at every level, companies ensure that their entire organization is aligned and moving in the same direction. Every decision, from product development to marketing campaigns to customer support, should contribute to the overall goal of winning.

Winning is a Choice

Chapter 2 of Playing to Win is a powerful reminder that winning is a choice. Companies must decide that they want to win and then define exactly what that means for their organization. By articulating a clear, customer-focused winning aspiration, businesses can align their resources, capabilities, and strategies toward achieving superior performance.

In essence, winning is not just about being in the game or doing well enough to survive. It is about setting bold, focused aspirations and making strategic decisions that position the company to achieve lasting success in its chosen markets. For leaders and entrepreneurs, this chapter offers a crucial insight: the first step to building a successful strategy is to define what winning looks like and commit to achieving it.

3. Where to Play

In Chapter 3 of Playing to Win, titled “Where to Play,” authors A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin delve into the critical importance of making deliberate choices about where a company will compete. As they define it, the “where to play” decision is one of the two most essential choices (the other being “how to win”) in any strategy. This chapter explores how identifying the right playing field—whether it be markets, geographies, customer segments, or product categories—can dramatically shape the outcomes of a company’s strategic efforts.

The central message of Chapter 3 is that no company can be all things to all people. Trying to succeed in every market, in every segment, or with every possible customer base dilutes focus and undermines competitive advantage. By narrowing down the areas of competition, companies can allocate resources, attention, and energy more effectively, giving them a much higher chance of winning in their chosen spaces.

What is “Where to Play”?

The “where to play” decision refers to selecting the specific arenas in which a company will compete. These choices shape how an organization allocates resources, defines its customer base, and structures its operations. Where to play is not just about geographic markets, although that is often a factor; it can also refer to decisions about:

• Customer segments: Which group of customers will the company target?
• Product categories: Which specific products or services will the company offer?
• Distribution channels: Will the company sell through retail, direct-to-consumer, online, or other methods?
• Geographies: Will the company focus on local, regional, national, or global markets?

A clear and thoughtful “where to play” choice allows companies to focus on the specific areas where they have the best chance of success. Without making these focused decisions, businesses often find themselves scattered and reactive, wasting resources on areas where they cannot win.

The Consequences of Poor “Where to Play” Choices

Companies that fail to make deliberate where to play choices often find themselves in a dangerous position. Instead of focusing on markets where they can develop a competitive edge, they end up trying to play everywhere, often with little success. This lack of focus leads to:

• Overextension: Spreading resources too thinly across too many markets.
• Inefficiency: Attempting to compete in areas where the company does not have the necessary capabilities or strengths.
• Market irrelevance: Failing to deeply understand and meet the specific needs of any particular customer base.

A common mistake businesses make is trying to be everything to everyone. This approach leads to mediocrity, as the company ends up with no clear identity or market leadership. For example, a business that targets all customer demographics often dilutes its value proposition, offering generic products that don’t strongly appeal to any one group.

Example: P&G’s Success with Olay

A compelling example in the chapter illustrates how P&G made a successful where to play choice when transforming the Olay skincare brand. In the late 1990s, Olay was struggling as an old-fashioned, inexpensive skincare product with limited relevance. The P&G leadership team had several options: they could launch a new brand, maintain Olay’s position in the bargain segment, or reinvent it.

They chose the latter and decided to target a new customer segment—women in their mid-thirties who were just beginning to notice signs of aging. This segment was underserved, as most anti-aging products were aimed at older women in their 50s and 60s. By focusing on younger women and positioning Olay as a premium yet affordable skincare brand, P&G successfully carved out a “masstige” category, blending the attributes of mass-market products with prestige branding.

The company also made strategic choices about where to sell Olay—focusing on mass-market channels like drugstores and large retailers, which it knew well. By narrowing its focus to this new segment and distribution strategy, P&G was able to turn Olay into a billion-dollar brand, demonstrating the power of making the right where to play decision.

Types of “Where to Play” Choices

There are several dimensions along which companies can make where to play choices. Each requires deliberate thought and analysis to align with a company’s overall aspirations and capabilities:

1. Geography: Deciding which regions or countries to compete in can determine a company’s success or failure. Companies must assess where they have the best chances of building a sustainable competitive advantage. For example, P&G initially chose to focus on developed markets like the U.S. before expanding into high-growth emerging markets like China.
2. Customer Segments: Different customers have different needs, and it is crucial to decide which segment to target. Is the company going after budget-conscious consumers or those willing to pay a premium for high-quality products? P&G, with Olay, chose to target women in their mid-thirties who wanted effective anti-aging products but at an accessible price point.
3. Product Categories: Companies must decide which product categories they will compete in and which ones they will avoid. This often involves evaluating where the company has core strengths or distinctive capabilities. P&G focused on anti-aging products for Olay, leveraging its expertise in product innovation and R&D to create highly effective skincare formulas.
4. Channels: The choice of sales channels—whether physical retail, direct-to-consumer, online, or third-party distributors—also plays a key role in strategy. The company must decide which channels will give it the greatest access to its target customers and provide the most cost-effective distribution.

A Dynamic Choice

Lafley and Martin make it clear that “where to play” is not a static choice. It evolves over time as markets shift, new opportunities emerge, and customer needs change. Companies must continually revisit their where to play decisions and adjust their strategies to stay competitive. However, the key is to make these changes deliberately and not as reactive responses to competitive pressure or market disruption.

Key Insights: Narrow the Focus to Win

The essence of Chapter 3 is that businesses must make focused, deliberate decisions about where they will compete. A strong where to play choice creates clarity, aligning resources, capabilities, and attention around the areas with the most potential for success. By doing so, companies can develop deeper insights into customer needs, deliver more effective solutions, and ultimately gain a competitive advantage.

Some critical takeaways from this chapter include:

• Choose markets where your company has the potential to win. This could be due to existing strengths, capabilities, or untapped customer needs.
• Make decisions about what markets not to enter. Saying “no” to certain markets or segments frees up resources to focus on the right areas.
• Align your choice with capabilities. Where you choose to compete must reflect the strengths and capabilities your company already possesses or can develop.

Winning Starts with a Focused Playing Field

In Chapter 3 of Playing to Win, Lafley and Martin reinforce that choosing the right playing field is a prerequisite to winning in the marketplace. By narrowing the focus and deciding on specific markets, customer segments, and products, companies can concentrate their efforts and build a sustainable competitive advantage.

For leaders and entrepreneurs, the lesson is clear: don’t try to compete everywhere. Choose your markets wisely, align your strengths with your chosen playing field, and focus on where you can deliver the most value. Winning is not about doing everything; it’s about excelling in the right places.

4. How to Win

Chapter 4 of Playing to Win, titled “How to Win,” delves into the second of the two most critical strategic decisions any organization must make—how it will win in its chosen markets. This chapter builds on the foundation laid by Chapter 3, which discusses the importance of selecting the right “where to play” options, by exploring the essential question of how a company can create a sustainable competitive advantage in those markets.

The authors, A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin, argue that winning is about finding a way to deliver superior value to customers in a manner that is difficult for competitors to replicate. The key to this lies in making specific choices about the company’s value proposition and ensuring that these choices align with its core strengths and the demands of its target market. Simply competing is not enough; companies need to figure out how to differentiate themselves and deliver unique value to customers in order to win.

How to Win: Creating a Competitive Advantage

The central theme of Chapter 4 is that the decision of how to win is all about crafting a unique value proposition. The authors argue that this means finding a way to either:

1. Deliver more value to customers at a comparable cost (which might involve superior products, services, or customer experiences), or
2. Deliver comparable value at a lower cost (through operational efficiencies or innovative business models).

These two approaches correspond to Michael Porter’s well-known competitive strategies: differentiation and cost leadership. However, Lafley and Martin go further by emphasizing that successful companies often combine both approaches, finding ways to deliver better value and to do so efficiently, creating a “sweet spot” in which they can outperform competitors on both fronts.

Real-World Example: P&G’s Strategy with Pampers

A prominent case in the chapter is P&G’s Pampers brand, which faced stiff competition from rival Huggies. In the 1980s, Pampers struggled as its product was seen as inferior to Huggies in terms of quality and performance, particularly around absorbency and fit. Huggies was also selling at a premium price, appealing to more affluent customers, while Pampers was largely viewed as a lower-cost option.

P&G needed to decide how to win in this highly competitive market. The company chose to focus on product innovation, improving Pampers to deliver superior performance that matched or exceeded Huggies while still maintaining a competitive price. P&G invested heavily in research and development to create thinner, more absorbent diapers, ultimately launching products that offered greater convenience and comfort for parents and babies alike.

By making the strategic choice to innovate and improve product performance while maintaining an affordable price point, Pampers became a market leader. This decision aligned perfectly with P&G’s core capabilities in product development and global distribution, allowing the brand to deliver superior value at a price that competitors found difficult to match. Pampers remains one of P&G’s flagship brands today, demonstrating the power of finding the right “how to win” formula.

Differentiation vs. Cost Leadership

Lafley and Martin emphasize that companies need to choose the right basis for winning—whether through differentiation, cost leadership, or a combination of both. However, they caution against trying to do everything, as trying to be all things to all people often leads to failure. Companies need to choose a specific approach that fits their target customers and capabilities.

Differentiation

To win through differentiation, a company must create products or services that offer unique value in the eyes of customers. This can take many forms:

• Superior product quality or performance (like Pampers’ innovations in absorbency).
• Better customer service or user experience (as seen with Apple’s focus on design and usability).
• A strong brand identity that resonates emotionally with customers (such as Nike’s alignment with athletic excellence and motivation).

Differentiation strategies often allow companies to charge a premium for their products because customers perceive the added value as worth the higher cost.

Cost Leadership

In contrast, cost leadership strategies focus on delivering products or services at a lower price than competitors, often through operational efficiencies, economies of scale, or innovative processes. Companies like Walmart, with its relentless focus on cost-cutting, thrive by offering good enough products at the lowest possible prices.

However, Lafley and Martin note that cost leadership alone is not enough to create a sustainable advantage. To truly win, companies must also ensure that the customer experience does not suffer as a result of cost-cutting. Customers need to feel that they are still receiving significant value even at a lower price point.

Combining Differentiation and Cost Leadership

The authors point out that some of the most successful strategies blend elements of both differentiation and cost leadership. They give the example of IKEA, which delivers modern, stylish furniture at affordable prices by optimizing its supply chain, relying on flat-pack designs that reduce shipping costs, and encouraging customers to assemble products themselves. This combination of efficiency and style has allowed IKEA to dominate the global furniture market, offering value on multiple fronts.

By finding ways to excel in both areas, companies can create a unique value proposition that is difficult for competitors to copy. However, Lafley and Martin stress that this approach is not easy and requires deep capabilities in both innovation and operational efficiency.

Aligning “How to Win” with “Where to Play”

A key point in Chapter 4 is the importance of aligning how to win with the earlier decision about where to play. These two choices are deeply interconnected, as different markets and customer segments may require different strategies for winning. For instance:

• In premium markets, a differentiation strategy may be more effective, as customers are willing to pay for superior quality or service.
• In price-sensitive markets, a cost leadership strategy could be the key to success, as customers prioritize affordability over luxury.

The Pampers example shows this alignment in action. By focusing on delivering superior value at an affordable price, P&G was able to appeal to its target customer base of parents looking for high-quality diapers without paying premium prices. This strategy fit well with Pampers’ “where to play” decision to target mass-market retail channels rather than high-end specialty stores.

The Role of Capabilities in Winning

Lafley and Martin highlight that a company’s core capabilities play a crucial role in determining how it can win. Winning is not just about having a clever strategy; it’s about executing that strategy effectively, which requires the right capabilities. Companies need to develop and leverage capabilities that align with their chosen strategy—whether it’s innovation, cost control, customer service, or something else.

For example, P&G’s strength in research and development enabled it to deliver superior product innovations like the thinner, more absorbent Pampers. Without this capability, the company’s strategy of winning through product differentiation would not have been successful. Similarly, companies focusing on cost leadership must develop world-class operational efficiencies and supply chain management to maintain their competitive edge.

Finding Your Unique Formula for Winning

In Chapter 4 of Playing to Win, Lafley and Martin make it clear that the key to winning is making deliberate, well-aligned choices about how a company will differentiate itself from competitors or deliver superior value more efficiently. Winning is not about being average in all areas; it’s about excelling in a few areas that truly matter to customers and that are difficult for competitors to replicate.

For leaders and entrepreneurs, the lesson is clear: to win, you must find your unique formula—the combination of value propositions, capabilities, and cost structures that allows you to deliver exceptional value in your chosen market. By doing so, you can carve out a sustainable competitive advantage and position your business for long-term success.

5. Play to Your Strengths

Chapter 5 of Playing to Win, titled “Play to Your Strengths,” explores the critical importance of aligning a company’s strategy with its core capabilities—the unique strengths that enable it to deliver on its strategic choices. In this chapter, A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin emphasize that businesses succeed by leveraging what they do best, and that winning strategies are grounded in the organization’s ability to exploit its key strengths to gain a competitive advantage.

The authors argue that strategy is not just about deciding where to play and how to win, but also about understanding and developing the capabilities necessary to support those choices. Without the right capabilities in place, even the most well-thought-out strategies are doomed to fail. In this chapter, Lafley and Martin explain how companies can identify their core capabilities and build on them to create a sustainable competitive edge.

What Are Capabilities?

Capabilities are defined as the collection of skills, technologies, and processes that a company uses to execute its strategy. They are the “how” behind a company’s success. These capabilities can range from product innovation to supply chain efficiency, marketing expertise, or operational excellence.

In simple terms, capabilities are what a company does particularly well—better than its competitors—and are the foundation on which strategic success is built. The authors emphasize that the right combination of capabilities is what enables a company to create value in a way that its rivals cannot easily replicate.

The Relationship Between Strategy and Capabilities

Lafley and Martin stress that a winning strategy is inseparable from capabilities. Once a company has made its strategic choices (where to play and how to win), it must identify which capabilities are needed to support and execute those choices. For example, a company that chooses to compete on product innovation must have strong research and development (R&D) capabilities to continuously generate new products that customers value.

The authors highlight a key insight: capabilities are not static. They must evolve in response to changes in the market, technology, and customer preferences. Successful companies continuously refine and develop their core capabilities to stay ahead of the competition. Building capabilities requires long-term commitment and investment, and companies must be willing to make the necessary sacrifices to strengthen their areas of expertise.

Procter & Gamble’s Core Capabilities

The chapter provides a detailed case study of Procter & Gamble (P&G), where Lafley served as CEO. P&G’s strategy revolved around delivering superior consumer goods that improved the lives of customers, and this strategy was built on a few key capabilities:

1. Deep consumer understanding: P&G invested heavily in understanding its consumers’ needs and preferences, which allowed the company to design products that resonated with its target audience.
2. Brand building: P&G excelled in creating powerful brands that stood for quality and innovation. Its marketing expertise ensured that consumers were willing to pay a premium for its products.
3. Product innovation: P&G consistently invested in R&D, allowing it to bring cutting-edge products to market across its many categories.
4. Go-to-market capabilities: P&G had strong relationships with retailers and a highly effective distribution system that ensured its products were always available to customers.

These capabilities allowed P&G to play successfully in the mass-market consumer goods space and win by delivering superior value to consumers.

The Power of Capability Reinforcement

An important concept discussed in this chapter is the idea of capability reinforcement. Lafley and Martin explain that capabilities work best when they are interlinked—when they reinforce and amplify one another. Rather than having isolated strengths, successful companies develop a network of capabilities that support their entire strategy.

For example, P&G’s capability in consumer understanding informed its product innovation, ensuring that its R&D efforts were always aligned with what customers wanted. At the same time, P&G’s brand-building capability ensured that these innovative products could be successfully marketed and sold to consumers at premium prices. The company’s distribution and go-to-market capabilities then ensured that these products were available to customers through the right channels.

By reinforcing each other, these capabilities created a powerful competitive advantage that was difficult for competitors to match. The lesson is that capabilities are not just individual strengths—they form an ecosystem that supports and sustains a company’s strategic choices.

Developing and Enhancing Capabilities

While many capabilities are inherent to a business, Lafley and Martin stress that companies need to continuously develop and enhance them to maintain a competitive edge. This requires:

1. Investment: Companies must be willing to invest in their capabilities, whether through training, technology upgrades, or R&D spending. These investments often take time to bear fruit but are crucial for long-term success.
2. Focus: Businesses must focus on the few capabilities that matter most to their strategy. Trying to excel in too many areas spreads resources too thin and dilutes the company’s competitive edge.
3. Capability-building culture: A strong culture of learning and improvement is essential for developing capabilities. Leaders must encourage employees to develop new skills, experiment with new processes, and continuously improve the company’s operational and strategic strengths.

An example given in the chapter is P&G’s investment in its global innovation system. This system brought together scientists, marketers, and supply chain experts from around the world to collaborate on new product ideas and innovations. This structure allowed P&G to consistently generate high-quality, market-leading products that aligned with its strategic goals.

Capability Gaps and Strategy Execution

A key challenge that businesses face is capability gaps—areas where the company’s existing capabilities are insufficient to support its strategy. When such gaps are identified, companies need to either build or acquire the missing capabilities to ensure that their strategic goals can be met.

Lafley and Martin note that not all capabilities need to be built internally. In some cases, companies can partner with external firms or acquire other businesses to gain access to the capabilities they lack. However, they warn that this must be done thoughtfully—acquisitions and partnerships only work when the new capabilities align with the company’s strategic goals and can be integrated effectively.

Example: Nike’s Capability in Innovation and Marketing

Lafley and Martin use Nike as another example of a company that has successfully aligned its strategy with its capabilities. Nike’s strategy revolves around creating high-performance athletic gear and building a brand that represents excellence, innovation, and inspiration.

To execute this strategy, Nike has developed two key capabilities:

1. Product innovation: Nike invests heavily in R&D to create cutting-edge athletic shoes and apparel. The company’s ability to innovate with materials, designs, and technology gives it a competitive edge in the sportswear market.
2. Brand power and marketing: Nike’s marketing is legendary, with iconic campaigns that resonate deeply with athletes and consumers alike. The company’s ability to tell compelling stories through its brand, backed by endorsements from top athletes, reinforces its position as a leader in the sports industry.

These capabilities work in tandem: Nike’s innovative products are marketed with an emotional, inspiring brand message, creating a powerful connection with its customers. This combination of product and brand leadership allows Nike to dominate the premium athletic gear market.

Focus on What You Do Best

Chapter 5 of Playing to Win reinforces the idea that strategy must be grounded in reality—specifically, the reality of what a company is capable of. While ambition is important, strategy without the right capabilities to execute it is bound to fail. Companies must identify their core strengths, invest in building and enhancing those capabilities, and ensure that they align with the company’s strategic goals.

For leaders and entrepreneurs, the lesson is clear: play to your strengths. Understand what your company does best, invest in those areas, and use them as the foundation for your strategy. By doing so, you can create a competitive advantage that is sustainable, scalable, and difficult for competitors to replicate.

6. Manage What Matters

In Chapter 6 of Playing to Win, titled “Manage What Matters,” authors A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin focus on how management systems must be aligned to support and reinforce a company’s strategy. They argue that successful execution of strategy requires not only making the right choices about where to play and how to win, but also implementing the right management systems to sustain and measure progress. Without properly designed systems to guide decisions, track progress, and ensure alignment, even the best strategies will falter.

This chapter explores how management systems—including performance metrics, incentives, and decision-making processes—can either support or undermine a company’s strategy. Lafley and Martin stress that the right management systems should create clarity, accountability, and focus across the organization, ensuring that everyone is working toward the same strategic goals.

What Are Management Systems?

Lafley and Martin define management systems as the formal and informal processes, structures, and tools that guide how a company operates. These systems include:

• Decision-making processes: How strategic decisions are made and who is responsible for them.
• Performance metrics: The KPIs and metrics used to measure success and progress.
• Incentive systems: The rewards and compensation structures that motivate employees to act in alignment with the company’s strategy.
• Information flows: The way information is shared within the organization, ensuring that everyone has the data they need to make informed decisions.

The authors argue that these systems are the backbone of strategy execution. They ensure that the strategic choices made at the leadership level are implemented consistently throughout the organization. Without the right systems in place, a company’s strategy will likely become fragmented, and execution will suffer.

Aligning Management Systems with Strategy

A key point in this chapter is the need to align management systems with the company’s strategic choices. Lafley and Martin emphasize that just as companies must make deliberate choices about where to play and how to win, they must also carefully design management systems that reinforce these choices.

For example, if a company’s strategy is to focus on innovation, then its management systems must support creativity, risk-taking, and collaboration. Performance metrics should focus on innovation outcomes, such as the number of new product launches or patents filed. Incentives should reward teams for experimentation and breakthroughs, even if some projects fail.

Conversely, if a company’s strategy is to compete on operational efficiency, its management systems should emphasize process optimization, cost control, and consistent execution. Metrics might focus on cost savings, supply chain efficiency, or production speed, and incentives should reward managers and teams who achieve efficiency goals.

Example: P&G’s Management Systems

At Procter & Gamble (P&G), where Lafley was CEO, management systems were carefully designed to support the company’s strategy of brand leadership and innovation. P&G’s strategy required the company to excel in consumer understanding, product innovation, and brand building, and its management systems were aligned to drive these priorities.

One of the key management systems at P&G was the innovation review process, which ensured that new product development was constantly evaluated and refined. Innovation was tracked across all stages of the development process, from initial concept to market launch, and performance metrics were tied to both the number of successful product launches and their impact on the company’s overall growth.

Additionally, talent management systems were crucial to P&G’s strategy. The company placed a strong emphasis on leadership development, ensuring that high-potential employees were given opportunities to grow and take on greater responsibilities. This focus on talent development helped P&G build a deep bench of leaders who were aligned with the company’s strategic goals.

P&G also used performance metrics and incentive systems to encourage accountability at all levels. By linking compensation to strategic outcomes, such as brand growth and market share gains, P&G ensured that its leaders were focused on driving the company’s long-term success.

The Importance of Metrics and Incentives

Lafley and Martin stress that metrics and incentives are two of the most powerful tools for aligning an organization with its strategy. The right metrics provide clarity about what matters most, while the right incentives ensure that employees are motivated to achieve those goals.

Metrics

Metrics must reflect the strategic priorities of the company. If the company is focused on growth, then metrics should track key drivers of growth, such as market share, customer acquisition, or product sales. If the strategy is centered on operational efficiency, then metrics should focus on areas like cost reduction, production speed, or supply chain optimization.

The authors caution against using too many metrics or measuring irrelevant activities. Overloading teams with an excessive number of KPIs can dilute focus and create confusion. Instead, companies should focus on a few critical metrics that directly link to the company’s strategy and performance.

Incentives

Incentive systems should reward behaviors and outcomes that are aligned with the company’s strategic objectives. If a company’s strategy is built on innovation, then employees should be rewarded for coming up with creative ideas, launching new products, and taking calculated risks. On the other hand, if the company is focused on efficiency, incentives should reward employees for reducing costs, improving processes, or meeting productivity targets.

Incentives should also encourage long-term thinking rather than short-term gains. Lafley and Martin emphasize that rewarding short-term performance, such as quarterly earnings, can lead to decisions that undermine long-term strategy. To avoid this, incentives must be tied to outcomes that align with the company’s long-term goals, such as sustainable growth or market leadership.

The Role of Leadership in Managing What Matters

Lafley and Martin underscore the importance of leadership in designing and maintaining effective management systems. Leaders are responsible for ensuring that the company’s systems are aligned with its strategy and that employees understand what is expected of them. Leaders must also be willing to make changes to management systems when they no longer serve the company’s strategic needs.

Leadership also plays a crucial role in communicating the strategy and ensuring that it is understood throughout the organization. Even the best-designed management systems will fail if employees are unclear about the company’s strategic priorities or if there is a lack of alignment between teams and departments.

At P&G, leadership played a key role in reinforcing the company’s strategic priorities through regular communication, performance reviews, and decision-making processes. Leaders were expected to model the behaviors that supported the company’s strategy and to hold their teams accountable for achieving strategic outcomes.

Avoiding Common Pitfalls

The chapter also highlights some common pitfalls that companies face when designing management systems:

1. Misalignment between strategy and systems: If management systems do not align with the company’s strategic choices, execution will suffer. For example, if a company’s strategy is focused on innovation but its incentive systems reward operational efficiency, employees will prioritize cost-cutting over creativity.
2. Short-term thinking: Overemphasizing short-term performance can lead to decisions that undermine long-term success. Incentives should be designed to encourage sustainable, long-term growth rather than short-term profit maximization.
3. Inflexibility: Management systems must be flexible enough to adapt to changing market conditions and strategic priorities. Companies that are too rigid in their processes and metrics may struggle to respond to new opportunities or challenges.

Managing for Strategic Success

In Chapter 6 of Playing to Win, Lafley and Martin make it clear that management systems are the key to executing strategy. Without the right systems in place, a company’s strategic choices will remain theoretical and never translate into real-world success. To manage effectively, companies must align their decision-making processes, performance metrics, and incentive systems with their strategic goals, ensuring that everyone in the organization is focused on what truly matters.

For leaders and entrepreneurs, the lesson is simple: manage what matters. Focus on creating management systems that reinforce your strategy, motivate your teams, and track the metrics that drive long-term success. By doing so, you can ensure that your strategy is executed with precision and that your company remains on the path to winning.

7. Think Through Strategy

In Chapter 7 of Playing to Win, titled “Think Through Strategy,” authors A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin explore the importance of rigorous strategic thinking to refine and strengthen a company’s strategy. They emphasize that effective strategy requires a structured, logical approach that connects the dots between choices and outcomes, ensuring that every decision is supported by sound reasoning. This chapter provides a framework for leaders and entrepreneurs to systematically think through their strategic choices and improve their chances of success.

The authors argue that while many companies create strategies, few take the time to fully think them through. Strategic thinking goes beyond brainstorming ideas or setting ambitious goals—it involves carefully analyzing how different choices interact, what their implications are, and how they can lead to sustainable competitive advantage. In this chapter, Lafley and Martin present a strategy logic flow, a tool to guide businesses through the process of strategic decision-making.

The Importance of Rigorous Strategic Thinking

The central theme of Chapter 7 is that great strategies are not born out of luck or intuition—they are the result of disciplined thinking and analysis. The authors emphasize that strategic thinking is about choosing deliberately, and making trade-offs that will position a company for long-term success. Without clear, structured thinking, strategies can easily become disjointed or reactive, leading to inconsistent execution and missed opportunities.

Lafley and Martin stress that every strategic decision has consequences. For example, a choice about where to play will affect how the company can win, which capabilities it will need to develop, and what management systems will be required to support the strategy. By thinking through each of these interconnected decisions, leaders can ensure that their strategy is cohesive and aligned at all levels.

The Strategy Logic Flow

To help leaders think through their strategies, the authors introduce the concept of the strategy logic flow. This tool breaks down the strategic thinking process into a series of questions that need to be answered in a logical, step-by-step manner. These questions help ensure that all strategic decisions are grounded in clear reasoning and supported by evidence. The strategy logic flow is organized around the following five key questions:

1. What is our winning aspiration?
   This question defines the company’s overall goal—what does success look like? What is the organization striving to achieve? A clear winning aspiration provides the focus for all subsequent choices.
2. Where will we play?
   Here, companies decide which markets, customer segments, product categories, or geographies they will target. This choice narrows the competitive field and sets the stage for how the company will compete.
3. How will we win?
   This question focuses on the competitive advantage the company will develop. Will the company win by offering superior products, providing exceptional customer service, or leveraging cost efficiencies?
4. What capabilities must be in place?
   Companies must then determine which capabilities they need to develop or enhance to support their strategic choices. These capabilities might include innovation, marketing, supply chain management, or customer relationships.
5. What management systems are required?
   Finally, companies need to put management systems in place to measure progress, allocate resources, and ensure that the strategy is executed effectively.

By answering these five questions in sequence, companies can create a clear, integrated strategy that is grounded in logical thinking. This approach ensures that all strategic choices are aligned and mutually reinforcing, minimizing the risk of disconnects between different parts of the organization.

Avoiding the Pitfalls of Flawed Thinking

One of the key insights in Chapter 7 is that many strategies fail not because of poor execution, but because of flawed thinking during the strategy formulation process. Lafley and Martin outline several common pitfalls that businesses fall into when developing their strategies:

1. Unsubstantiated assumptions: Many companies base their strategies on assumptions that are never tested or validated. For example, they may assume that customers want a particular feature or that a certain market will grow, without gathering evidence to support these assumptions. To avoid this, the authors recommend that companies challenge their assumptions and seek data to back them up.
2. Inconsistency between choices: Another common mistake is failing to ensure that the different parts of the strategy work together. For example, a company may choose to compete on the basis of innovation, but then fail to invest in the R&D capabilities needed to support that strategy. Lafley and Martin argue that every strategic choice must be logically connected and mutually reinforcing.
3. Ignoring trade-offs: Strategic choices inevitably involve trade-offs. For example, choosing to focus on one customer segment may mean sacrificing opportunities in another. Companies that try to pursue too many opportunities at once often dilute their focus and fail to win in any of them. Successful strategies, according to the authors, are those that embrace trade-offs and focus on winning in a specific area.
4. Lack of focus on winning: Some companies mistake activity for strategy. They may develop ambitious plans or launch multiple initiatives, but without a clear focus on winning—becoming the best in their chosen markets. Lafley and Martin stress that strategy must always be oriented around achieving a competitive advantage, not just “playing the game.”

Example: P&G’s Strategic Thinking in Beauty Care

The chapter provides a case study of Procter & Gamble’s (P&G) approach to strategy in the beauty care sector, which demonstrates how rigorous strategic thinking can lead to success. In the early 2000s, P&G sought to become a global leader in the beauty category, but it faced significant challenges, including stiff competition from established brands like L’Oréal and Estée Lauder.

Using the strategy logic flow, P&G defined its winning aspiration as becoming the market leader in premium and mass-market beauty products. It identified key markets where it could compete effectively, such as skincare and haircare, and decided to win by leveraging its expertise in consumer understanding and product innovation.

P&G built the necessary capabilities by investing heavily in R&D, marketing, and brand-building. It developed a series of innovative products, such as the Olay Total Effects line, which offered cutting-edge anti-aging solutions at an affordable price point. P&G also created management systems to ensure that its global beauty teams were aligned and that progress was tracked across different regions and product lines.

This logical and systematic approach allowed P&G to expand its presence in the beauty market and build a portfolio of successful brands. By thinking through its strategy in a structured way, P&G was able to make the right choices and execute them effectively.

Testing Your Strategy: The Reverse Engineering Process

Another key concept introduced in Chapter 7 is reverse engineering, a process that allows companies to test the logic and coherence of their strategy. Reverse engineering involves starting with the desired outcome (e.g., achieving market leadership) and working backward to identify the necessary conditions and choices that would make that outcome possible.

By reverse engineering their strategy, companies can identify gaps or inconsistencies in their thinking. For example, if a company aspires to dominate a particular market but has not made the necessary investments in capabilities, reverse engineering will reveal this disconnect. This process allows companies to refine their strategies and ensure that they are fully aligned with their goals.

Strategic Thinking as a Discipline

In Chapter 7 of Playing to Win, Lafley and Martin emphasize that thinking through strategy is a disciplined, structured process that requires careful analysis and logical reasoning. Great strategies are not created through intuition or guesswork—they are the result of methodical thinking that connects choices, capabilities, and outcomes.

For leaders and entrepreneurs, the lesson is clear: take the time to think deeply about your strategy. Use tools like the strategy logic flow and reverse engineering to ensure that your choices are grounded in reality, aligned with each other, and supported by the necessary capabilities. By doing so, you can create a winning strategy that positions your company for long-term success.

8. Shorten Your Odds

Chapter 8 of Playing to Win, titled “Shorten Your Odds,” is the final chapter in which A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin offer insights on improving the chances of success in strategy execution. While earlier chapters focus on formulating a winning strategy through deliberate choices about where to play and how to win, Chapter 8 provides practical guidance on how leaders can increase the likelihood of successfully implementing those choices. The authors argue that even the best strategies involve uncertainty, but leaders can actively manage and reduce this uncertainty by following a systematic approach.

The core theme of this chapter is that successful strategy is not a gamble, but rather the result of thoughtful decision-making and a process that improves the chances of winning. Lafley and Martin introduce three key approaches to “shorten your odds”—or, in other words, to enhance the probability that a company’s strategy will succeed in a competitive marketplace.

Managing the Uncertainty in Strategy Execution

The authors begin by acknowledging that no strategy, no matter how well-conceived, is free from risk. Markets are dynamic, competitors are unpredictable, and customer preferences can change. Despite this uncertainty, Lafley and Martin emphasize that leaders can actively manage risk to improve their chances of success. Rather than relying on luck, companies can take a proactive approach to reduce the odds of failure.

The authors present three key actions that leaders can take to shorten the odds in their favor:

1. Use iterative testing and learning to refine your strategy.
2. Involve the right people in strategy-making and execution.
3. Have the courage to make bold choices and stick to them.

1. Iterative Testing and Learning

The first way to increase the likelihood of success is through iterative testing and learning. Lafley and Martin argue that instead of betting everything on one big strategic move, companies should test their assumptions and refine their strategies based on real-world feedback. This approach allows companies to make incremental progress while gathering insights that help them adjust course when necessary.

By breaking down the strategy into smaller, manageable initiatives and testing them in the marketplace, companies can see what works and what doesn’t. This learning-by-doing approach minimizes risk, as companies can make adjustments before fully committing to large-scale implementation.

A great example provided in the chapter is Procter & Gamble’s (P&G) approach to launching new products. P&G often begins by testing new products in select markets or customer segments before rolling them out globally. This allows the company to identify any issues, refine the product offering, and improve its marketing strategy based on real customer feedback. The process reduces the risk of a full-scale launch failing by providing valuable learning opportunities at an early stage.

The authors recommend this iterative approach not only for new products but also for business model innovations, market expansion, and even organizational changes. By continuously testing and learning, companies can gradually refine their strategies, improve their odds of success, and ensure they are responding to real-world conditions rather than theoretical assumptions.

2. Involve the Right People

The second way to shorten the odds is to involve the right people in both the creation and execution of strategy. Lafley and Martin emphasize that strategy is not just the responsibility of senior leadership; it requires input and buy-in from all levels of the organization. The authors argue that effective strategy execution is a collective effort, and ensuring the right people are engaged throughout the process dramatically improves the chances of success.

Involving the right people means:

• Engaging cross-functional teams: This helps break down silos and ensures that different parts of the organization are aligned with the overall strategy. By including leaders from various departments, companies ensure that every area of the business understands its role in executing the strategy.
• Leveraging frontline insights: The people who interact with customers, suppliers, and competitors often have the most relevant information about what’s happening in the market. Their input can provide valuable insights that improve the quality of strategic decisions.
• Gaining commitment from key stakeholders: Without the full commitment of those responsible for executing the strategy, even the best ideas will falter. Leaders must communicate the strategy effectively and ensure that everyone is on board with the plan.

An illustrative case is P&G’s efforts to reinvent the Olay brand. To successfully reposition Olay from a low-cost skincare product to a premium “masstige” brand, P&G involved cross-functional teams from R&D, marketing, sales, and supply chain management. This collaborative effort ensured that every aspect of the business—from product development to distribution—was aligned with the new strategy. By engaging key stakeholders and obtaining their buy-in, P&G increased the odds of success for the Olay relaunch.

3. Courage to Make Bold Choices

The final piece of advice from Lafley and Martin is to have the courage to make bold choices and stick to them. Strategy is inherently about making tough decisions—deciding where to invest, where to pull back, and what trade-offs are necessary. However, many companies falter because they lack the courage to follow through on these decisions, especially when faced with uncertainty or internal resistance.

The authors argue that bold choices are often required to break away from the competition and create a sustainable competitive advantage. Leaders must be willing to take calculated risks, invest in the future, and resist the temptation to retreat into safe, familiar territory.

Bold choices don’t necessarily mean reckless decisions. Instead, they are deliberate, well-considered actions that may involve significant risk but are based on sound strategic reasoning. Lafley and Martin stress that once these choices are made, leaders must stay the course and resist the urge to abandon their strategy prematurely due to short-term challenges.

A powerful example of bold decision-making is Apple’s choice to invest heavily in design and user experience under Steve Jobs. At the time, many industry experts questioned Apple’s focus on aesthetics and user-friendly interfaces, especially in a technology-driven market dominated by functional products. However, this bold choice helped Apple differentiate itself from competitors and build a brand associated with innovation and simplicity, ultimately leading to the company’s success with products like the iPhone and iPad.

The Role of Discipline and Flexibility

In addition to these three key actions, Lafley and Martin highlight the need for discipline and flexibility in executing strategy. Companies must strike a balance between being disciplined in sticking to their strategic choices and being flexible enough to adapt when new information arises. This balance is particularly important in fast-changing markets, where rigidity can lead to missed opportunities, but constant shifts can create confusion and instability.

The authors suggest that companies use a feedback loop to continually assess how their strategy is performing. Regular reviews and checkpoints allow businesses to evaluate progress, gather new insights, and make adjustments without abandoning the strategy altogether. This approach provides the flexibility needed to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining a disciplined focus on long-term goals.

Winning Is About Managing Risk

In Chapter 8 of Playing to Win, Lafley and Martin provide a practical framework for increasing the odds of strategic success. By iteratively testing and learning, involving the right people, and having the courage to make bold choices, leaders can reduce the uncertainty inherent in strategy execution and improve their chances of winning.

The key takeaway from this chapter is that strategy should not be viewed as a gamble, but as a deliberate, thoughtful process. By managing risk through careful planning, testing, and execution, leaders can “shorten the odds” in their favor and position their companies for long-term success.

For leaders and entrepreneurs, the final message is clear: take control of your strategy by making deliberate choices, involving your people, and testing your assumptions. By doing so, you can significantly improve the odds of achieving your strategic goals and winning in the marketplace.

9. The Endless Pursuit of Winning

Chapter 9 of Playing to Win, titled “The Endless Pursuit of Winning,” serves as a conclusion to the book’s central argument: strategy is an ongoing journey, not a one-time event. A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin emphasize that the pursuit of winning is never truly finished. Markets, competitors, and customers are constantly evolving, and companies must continually revisit and refine their strategies to stay ahead. This chapter encapsulates the essence of the book, urging leaders to see strategy as a dynamic and iterative process that requires continuous learning, adaptation, and bold decision-making.

The authors reflect on the idea that winning in business is not just about achieving a single victory, but about sustaining competitive advantage over the long term. To do this, companies need to develop a culture of strategic discipline, constantly reassessing where to play and how to win in a changing world.

Winning Is Never Static

The key insight of this chapter is that winning is never static. Lafley and Martin argue that the most successful companies understand that what worked yesterday might not work tomorrow. Competitive advantage is not permanent, and even the most dominant businesses can be displaced if they fail to adapt to new realities.

The authors point out that many companies become complacent after achieving success. They assume that their winning formula will continue to work indefinitely, and as a result, they stop pushing for innovation, overlook shifts in the market, or become reactive instead of proactive. This mindset is dangerous because it opens the door for competitors to overtake them.

To avoid this trap, companies need to adopt a mindset of constant vigilance. Leaders must regularly ask themselves: Are we still playing in the right markets? Are we still delivering superior value to our customers? Are there new threats or opportunities we need to consider? By staying attuned to the changing competitive landscape, companies can continue to evolve and improve their chances of winning over time.

The Need for Continuous Strategic Renewal

The authors advocate for a process of continuous strategic renewal, where companies revisit their strategies on a regular basis to ensure they remain aligned with their goals and the external environment. This doesn’t mean completely overhauling the strategy every few years, but rather making incremental adjustments based on new insights, market shifts, or technological changes.

Lafley and Martin suggest that this process of renewal involves revisiting the five key strategic questions they introduced earlier in the book:

1. What is our winning aspiration?
2. Where will we play?
3. How will we win?
4. What capabilities must be in place?
5. What management systems are required?

By regularly reviewing these questions, leaders can ensure that their strategy continues to reflect the realities of the market and the organization’s strengths. This process helps companies stay agile, identify new growth opportunities, and avoid being blindsided by changes in the competitive landscape.

Example: P&G’s Constant Evolution

Throughout the book, Lafley and Martin use Procter & Gamble (P&G) as a case study, and in this chapter, they highlight how P&G’s success has been driven by its commitment to continuous strategic renewal. Even when P&G was a market leader in many product categories, the company’s leadership understood the need to continually adapt to maintain its competitive edge.

One example of this is P&G’s expansion into emerging markets. As growth in developed markets began to slow, P&G recognized the need to adjust its strategy and focus on new, high-growth regions such as Asia and Latin America. This required significant changes to P&G’s product lines, pricing strategies, and distribution channels, but it allowed the company to sustain growth and remain competitive in a shifting global economy.

Another example is P&G’s digital transformation. As consumer habits changed and more purchasing decisions were being made online, P&G recognized the need to invest in e-commerce, data analytics, and digital marketing to stay relevant. By continuously adapting its strategy to reflect new market realities, P&G has been able to maintain its position as a leading global consumer goods company.

The Role of Leadership in Sustaining Winning

Lafley and Martin emphasize that leadership is critical to sustaining a winning strategy. It is the responsibility of leaders to foster a culture that embraces continuous improvement and strategic discipline. Leaders must encourage their teams to challenge assumptions, seek out new opportunities, and remain focused on long-term success.

One of the challenges of sustaining a winning strategy is that leaders often face pressure to deliver short-term results. Shareholders and stakeholders may demand quick wins or immediate profitability, which can lead to short-term thinking. However, Lafley and Martin argue that great leaders resist this pressure and focus on building strategies that deliver long-term value. They make bold choices that may involve short-term sacrifices but are necessary for sustained success.

Leaders must also be willing to make difficult decisions about when to pivot, exit markets, or invest in new capabilities. The authors explain that many leaders are hesitant to abandon a winning formula even when it is no longer effective. However, companies that fail to evolve and make tough choices eventually lose their competitive advantage. Sustaining winning requires courage, foresight, and discipline.

Strategic Leadership: A Long-Term Perspective

Another critical point made in this chapter is the need for strategic leadership with a long-term perspective. Successful leaders understand that strategy is not just about achieving short-term goals but about building a sustainable competitive position that can evolve over time.

Lafley and Martin urge leaders to develop strategic foresight—the ability to anticipate future trends, technologies, and disruptions that could affect the company’s strategy. By focusing on the long term and preparing for future challenges, companies can create more resilient strategies that can weather changes in the market.

Building a Culture of Strategic Discipline

An essential aspect of sustaining a winning strategy is creating a culture of strategic discipline. This means that everyone in the organization, from top executives to front-line employees, is aligned with the company’s strategic goals and understands their role in achieving them.

To build this culture, Lafley and Martin recommend:

1. Embedding strategy into daily operations: Strategy should not be something that only top executives discuss in annual meetings. It should be embedded in every decision, from product development to marketing to customer service.
2. Rewarding long-term thinking: Companies should design incentive systems that reward employees for contributing to the long-term success of the organization, rather than focusing solely on short-term performance metrics.
3. Fostering open communication: Leaders must create an environment where employees feel comfortable challenging assumptions and providing feedback on the strategy. This open dialogue allows for continuous learning and improvement.

The Endless Pursuit of Winning: Never Resting on Laurels

The ultimate message of Chapter 9 is that winning is a journey, not a destination. Companies that rest on their laurels and assume they have “won” are at risk of being disrupted by competitors who are hungrier and more adaptable. The pursuit of winning requires a constant effort to refine and evolve the strategy, ensuring that the company remains relevant and competitive.

Lafley and Martin conclude that great companies never stop striving to improve. They never settle for good enough. Instead, they embrace the endless pursuit of winning, continually pushing themselves to innovate, adapt, and lead their industries. This mindset is what separates companies that achieve temporary success from those that sustain long-term competitive advantage.

The Journey of Continuous Winning

In the final chapter of Playing to Win, A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin leave leaders with a powerful message: strategy is not a one-time event but an ongoing journey. Winning is never guaranteed, and even the most successful companies must continually revisit their strategies to ensure they remain relevant in a fast-changing world.

By embracing the principles of strategic discipline, continuous renewal, and long-term thinking, leaders can position their organizations to win not just today but in the future. The pursuit of winning is endless, and the companies that succeed are those that remain vigilant, adaptive, and courageous in the face of uncertainty.

For entrepreneurs and business leaders, the key takeaway is clear: always keep pushing forward. The market will continue to evolve, and competitors will always be looking for ways to overtake you. The only way to stay ahead is to continually refine your strategy, embrace change, and never stop pursuing the next win.

For more articles on Strategy and Planning, click here.